The Digital Security Act (DSA) has been changed to change the Cyber Security Act, but there is apprehension about the issues of some sections, especially the controversial section 43. The Digital Security Act has been replaced by the Cyber Security Act. As a result, it is likely to be advancing in the Digital Act, as it is possible in the new law, the same may be a matter of the same.
Meanwhile, Gottren Lewis, the UN resident coordinator in Bangladesh, met with Law Minister Anisul Haque on Tuesday, he told reporters after the meeting that he had heard that the changes in the Digital Security Act were made, I am happy if it is true. "The Digital Security Act has been changed and the Cyber Security Act has been changed. I am not a technical knowledge of the law to properly verify the law. But I am very happy with this change. We have to see what has been changed in the law."
The law minister said that the government is thinking whether the trial of the cases filed under the Digital Security Act is made under the new law. Legal experts say that there is no use in revising the law by maintaining the clause of the clause. They think that this old trend of arresting the law should not be done. If the opinions of the concerned were taken, there would not have been so much criticism, if some clauses are not being changed to reduce the sentence and imposition of fines compared to the Digital Security Act, the new law does not have much advantage for the victims. According to them, some of the changes in the changed law are going to be different in the changed law.
Incidentally: Section 43 of the Digital Security Act is mentioned, if a police officer is It is assumed that a crime under this Act may be or is being committed or is likely to be or is being or is likely to be lost, lost, deleted, changed or otherwise scarce, but he can do the following reasons for his belief:
(a) Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tar Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tar Tati Tari Tar Tari Tar Tari Tar Tari Tari Tar Tari Tari Tar Tari Tari Tari Tar Tattika Tar Tati Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tat Tari Tatt Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tari Tattr Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tari Tatt Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tari Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tattr Tari Ta
Meanwhile, in response to the criticism of the cyber security law, Law Minister Anisul Haque said on Tuesday that those who are criticizing are commenting on the thing without their understanding. They do not think any of our actions are good. He was questioned that this law will also cause suffering to the people.
Meanwhile, former Law Minister Barrister Shafiq Ahmed told Jugantar that the new law should have been amended. But the poison of amendment of the law depends on the environment.
The law should be kept in mind that the law is the most beneficial for the public. Section 43 of the Digital Security Act should be rethinking. In the new law, people should take careful steps to prevent the threat of violence.
He also said that the law that infects people but is being made for the people should be reconsidered. Kazi Ritazul Haque said if What is the benefit of amending the law from section 43, but what is the benefit of amending the law! In the new law, some clauses have reduced the punishment. But there is apprehension. Before making the law, it would not be better if people were given the law. It would have been better if people were given the law. I did not see the law but it was very popular.
Dr. Ritazul Haque thinks that it is not clear who will get the money of the defamation case. The law should specify the fine as the state or the person will get.
Senior lawyer of the Supreme Court. Shahdeen Malik told Jugantar that the punishment shown to the new law has been reduced, there is no good news for those who have been abused by the law, who were jailed for seven years and now they will be 3 years in jail. I don't see anything like this.
He added that there has been no change in the main objections of the Digital Security Act, he said, "The stakeholders should be disenfranchised. All the world, the law should be published in front of the people. After the introduction of the Parliament, the law passed, before the people could not know anything.
The Law Minister says that those who are criticizing the law are criticizing the law and after the minister's comments, Noor Khan Liton, executive director of the Law and Arbitration Center (ASC), told Jugantar that the minister said this is not appropriate because the law should not be discussed with the participants in the poison of law.
The legal aspects of the law I don't know if the government has taken anyone's opinion, he added, "All the comments on various aspects of the law are close to the public or the stakeholders. If there was a mindset of discussion or taking an opinion, many problems would have been solved.
He said, "The law enforcement or correction has been made. But why would it be a cause of fear for the common people? 43 Section 43 The poison of the body search and equipment seizure was a huge debate. The new cyber security law has kept this trend unchanged. Noor Khan thinks this article has been kept unchanged and the news of the new cyber security law has been kept unchanged."
After the meeting, Law Minister Anisul Haque told reporters that the Digital Security Act has not been amended, and it has not been canceled. It has only been changed. It is said that the law has been canceled. It is not a matter of understanding.
"We will sit on the issue that has been done before the poisoning. We will think about the cases that have been done before. Rights activists have been vocal in various countries to demand the cancellation of the law. The international human rights organizations, as well as the United Nations Human Rights Affairs High Commissioner, have immediately suspended the use of this Act and called for reforms in line with the conditions of international human rights law."
The law minister said that the Digital Security Act has not been amended, and if someone says that the Digital Security Act has been repealed, it will not be completely correct. The change has been done. The cyber security law will cause suffering for the people, fears are being expressed from various quarters, including the BNP. A few lawyers including Shahdeen Malik said that the new law will not reduce the violence of people and this law has given unlimited power to the police.
When attention was drawn to this poison, Anisul Haque said, "They do not think we have any steps good but our steps are good for the country, he said, next to the new law in September, the nationality will be presented in the parliament."
